| Are Internet psychics real? And how do the actual | | | | information that comes through is truly astounding. |
| readings work? Maybe even MORE importantly......how | | | | In recent scientific tests done of popular mediums, |
| CAN they work? I mean, if you aren't' seeing | | | | for example...the PHONE readings were the very |
| someone "one on one", psychic abilities seem like an | | | | best, as rated by everyone involved. (the psychics |
| impossibility, right? | | | | themselves, the customers, and the "skeptical" |
| It's amazing how many people perceive that this is | | | | scientists who were studying the psychic sessions |
| the truth. In reality....some of the BEST (and most | | | | for accuracy) And this is NOT an isolated example....as |
| impressive) psychic readings are done without EVER | | | | a matter of fact, the esteemed Windbridge Institute |
| having met the client, customer or "sitter." As a | | | | (a scientific "think tank" for the study of life after |
| matter of act, in some SCIENTIFIC settings, these | | | | death, psychic mediums and other "paranormal" |
| sort of readings are actually preferred, when | | | | phenomena) they actually RATE their psychics on a |
| considering "evidence" that psychic abilities, and | | | | scale, and some of the very best rated do MOST of |
| readers are TRULY doing what they say they are | | | | their work on the phone. |
| doing. | | | | The bottom line? |
| Very simply, a psychic "chat" that is really accurate is | | | | Phone psychics are as good as in person readings, |
| almost impossible to explain away. If a reader gives | | | | and often, in my view, MUCH better. There is FAR |
| you information that would be IMPOSSIBLE for them | | | | less fear of fraud. You can "see" a psychic who lives |
| to know without ever having even met you, the | | | | completely across the country. (or the world!) And |
| likelihood of fraud goes away almost entirely. In "one | | | | you can do it in a non confrontational environment |
| on one" in person meetings, for example, body | | | | that YOU control. (and in my experience, this is a |
| language "tells", cold reading or other sneaky | | | | very good thing indeed! |
| techniques are often suspected, even when the | | | | |